<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Must-see Haskell talks at OSCON &#8217;07</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2007/04/16/must-see-haskell-talks-at-oscon-07/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2007/04/16/must-see-haskell-talks-at-oscon-07/</link>
	<description>Bryan O&#039;Sullivan&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Meinel</title>
		<link>http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2007/04/16/must-see-haskell-talks-at-oscon-07/comment-page-1/#comment-40967</link>
		<dc:creator>John Meinel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2007/04/16/must-see-haskell-talks-at-oscon-07/#comment-40967</guid>
		<description>ndp looks very interesting. Thanks for the link.

It seems like a really interesting way to write out your problem as a mathematical formula, and have the underpinnings break that down and build it back up into a fairly optimized routine.

I imagine, though, that ndp is basically writing another compiler, just at a different level. I wonder why they are having such difficulty combining the syntactic sugar with the real implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ndp looks very interesting. Thanks for the link.</p>
<p>It seems like a really interesting way to write out your problem as a mathematical formula, and have the underpinnings break that down and build it back up into a fairly optimized routine.</p>
<p>I imagine, though, that ndp is basically writing another compiler, just at a different level. I wonder why they are having such difficulty combining the syntactic sugar with the real implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan O'Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2007/04/16/must-see-haskell-talks-at-oscon-07/comment-page-1/#comment-39275</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan O'Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2007/04/16/must-see-haskell-talks-at-oscon-07/#comment-39275</guid>
		<description>Oops. Apparently, Adam Turoff presented something at OSCON last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. Apparently, Adam Turoff presented something at OSCON last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

