<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some notes on the future of Haskell and FP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2008/09/26/some-notes-on-the-future-of-haskell-and-fp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2008/09/26/some-notes-on-the-future-of-haskell-and-fp/</link>
	<description>Bryan O'Sullivan's blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 筆記與流年 &#187; 網路書簽 &#187; links for 2009-05-06</title>
		<link>http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2008/09/26/some-notes-on-the-future-of-haskell-and-fp/comment-page-1/#comment-228365</link>
		<dc:creator>筆記與流年 &#187; 網路書簽 &#187; links for 2009-05-06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serpentine.com/blog/?p=265#comment-228365</guid>
		<description>[...] teideal glic deisbhéalach » Blog Archive » Some notes on the future of Haskell and FP how hackage evolve into a platform (tags: haskell functional platform hackage) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] teideal glic deisbhéalach » Blog Archive » Some notes on the future of Haskell and FP how hackage evolve into a platform (tags: haskell functional platform hackage) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi</title>
		<link>http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2008/09/26/some-notes-on-the-future-of-haskell-and-fp/comment-page-1/#comment-181733</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.serpentine.com/blog/?p=265#comment-181733</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree about the change in ICFP. To take one example, the growth between CUFP today and the first CUFP in 2004 is amazing. The entire 2004 group did fit in less than a quarter of the 2008&#039;s ballroom. The organizers weren&#039;t even sure whether CUFP would be an annual event at ICFP - they thought every other year might be enough.  There is a small part of me that misses the smaller, more intimate group, but I think the larger and more vibrant commercial more than makes up for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree about the change in ICFP. To take one example, the growth between CUFP today and the first CUFP in 2004 is amazing. The entire 2004 group did fit in less than a quarter of the 2008&#8242;s ballroom. The organizers weren&#8217;t even sure whether CUFP would be an annual event at ICFP &#8211; they thought every other year might be enough.  There is a small part of me that misses the smaller, more intimate group, but I think the larger and more vibrant commercial more than makes up for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
