Comments on: Unix hacking in Haskell: better pseudoterminal support http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2008/09/30/unix-hacking-in-haskell-better-pseudoterminal-support/ Bryan O'Sullivan's blog Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:41:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mathijs Kwik http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2008/09/30/unix-hacking-in-haskell-better-pseudoterminal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-256622 Mathijs Kwik Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:54:18 +0000 http://www.serpentine.com/blog/?p=281#comment-256622 This code is quite useful, but both executePseudoTerminal and executePseudoTerminalFD blow up with "hardware fault (Input/output error)" when the child process exits and I try to read more of its output. Is it possible to have child-exits just result in a EOF? That way hGetContents won't break. Thanks for any help This code is quite useful, but both executePseudoTerminal and executePseudoTerminalFD blow up with “hardware fault (Input/output error)” when the child process exits and I try to read more of its output.

Is it possible to have child-exits just result in a EOF?
That way hGetContents won’t break.

Thanks for any help

]]> By: Ian Taylor http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2008/09/30/unix-hacking-in-haskell-better-pseudoterminal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-223765 Ian Taylor Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:56:44 +0000 http://www.serpentine.com/blog/?p=281#comment-223765 This is very useful and I too would like to see it either in the unix package or on hackage. Anything I can do to help? Packaging, testing? This is very useful and I too would like to see it either in the unix package or on hackage.

Anything I can do to help? Packaging, testing?

]]> By: Kevin Ballard http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2008/09/30/unix-hacking-in-haskell-better-pseudoterminal-support/comment-page-1/#comment-217297 Kevin Ballard Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:48:38 +0000 http://www.serpentine.com/blog/?p=281#comment-217297 This looks useful. Why isn't it on Hackage? This looks useful. Why isn’t it on Hackage?

]]>