In which I write again about revision control

Several months ago, I wrote an article on evaluating revision control systems. It was initially published in ACM Queue a few weeks ago, and the article has now made its way (unchanged) to Communications of the ACM. I’m quite happy with how it turned out, and I hope that people will find it useful in figuring out what’s important to them.

Since the publication of the article, a few people have asked why I didn’t write about their favourite revision control system. The simple answer is that I was already about 50% over my initial word budget by the time I finished up what I did write. (I’ll confess that I was thoroughly charmed by a conspiratorial suggestion that I was editing some beloved tool out of history by not mentioning it.)

Posted in open source, scm
3 comments on “In which I write again about revision control
  1. Mark Luders says:

    Hi Bryan!
    What a great article (ACM Queue) on revision control software. I just finished reading (almost all of) it. I work in a group that writes a lot of sas code, some on PC, lots on MVS (IBM mainframe), that could potentially really benefit from using such a tool. Would be interested in any reference/info you have on this topic aimed that addresses issues of change management for the z/os operating system. btw, I’m in Oakland.
    Cheers, Mark

  2. Hi, Mark –

    I’m afraid I know nothing whatsoever about mainframes, or what revision control tools might be available on them. Sorry.

  3. Shreya says:

    RE: I Agree With You and Pegasus BothBut to butcher ax the only fdaerel expense our Constitution actually allows in writing, defense of our country .then go into a temper tantrum when home mortgage tax deductions are possibly eliminated, sounds too much like the Tea Party elite. Cut them, not me.It also reminds me of what AZ’s SB 10170 Bill and now Washington State’s Initiative 502 states rights possibly being flipantly challenged by Obama’s DOJ, irrespective of our Constitution’s 10th Ammendment, which allows states to dictate their own laws by majority voter rule, that are not specifically referenced in the Constitution.Defense of our country is specifically referenced in the Constitution BTW. Our American Constitution isn’t just toilet paper either. Rate this comment: 0 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *