Anatol Rapaport on argument

Here’s a wonderful excerpt from a book review written by Daniel Dennett, in which he paraphrases Rapaport on how to argue constructively.
Serious argument depends on mutual respect, and this is often hard to engender when disagreements turn vehement. The social psychologist and game theorist Anatol Rapoport (creator of the winning Tit-for-Tat strategy in Robert Axelrod’s legendary prisoner’s dilemma tournament) once promulgated a list of rules for how to write a successful critical commentary on an opponent’s work. First, he said, you must attempt to re-express your opponent’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your opponent says “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way.” Then, you should list any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement), and third, you should mention anything you have learned from your opponent. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism. I have found this a salutary discipline to follow–or, since it is challenging, to attempt to follow. When it succeeds, the results are gratifying: your opponent is in a mood to be enlightened and eagerly attentive.
Posted in Uncategorized
2 comments on “Anatol Rapaport on argument
  1. What an excellent reference! I think it’s brilliant. Could you perhaps point to a link giving the full context of Anatol Rapoport’s work?

  2. Bender says:

    Есть табакерка с двумя клеймами . На одном идущий лев , как на гербе. Другое внизу 14 1\2 . На крышке с боку 1652 и клеймо в виде елочки. Помогите с оценкой. Что значат эти клейма. Есть гравировка на крышке, с боку сделана надпись дарственная 1843 по немецки:Demtreuen Diener G.J Rother der duroh50 Fahre demHausegrass Barth unermudlich und ohne Fehl gnideet hat genidmet vondem dankbaron H.Darth Breslau,d14,April1843

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *